# CHCA Player Selection (PS) Score — How It Is Calculated The Player Selection (PS) score is a single number out of **100** that ranks players for team selection **within their own age group**. It is built from five categories. | Category | Max | How it is measured | |---|---:|---| | District Trial Performance | 40 | Automatic, from designated district-trial results | | Official Rating | 20 | Automatic, from a weighted rating | | District Participation | 20 | Manual — admin confirms attendance at hosted events | | Conduct & Discipline | 10 | Starts at 10, deducted per logged incident | | Proof of Income | 10 | Band of the uploaded income document (−5 if none) | Total is clamped to the 0–100 range. --- ## 1. District Trial Performance (40) Each trial a player takes part in is scored out of 40 as three sub-factors, then a player's final component score is the **average across all trials** they played this season. **Final Standing (20)** — standing is derived from points scored in the trial crosstable (ties broken by higher average opponent rating). | Final Standing | Points | |---|---:| | 1st–3rd | 20 | | 4th–10th | 15 | | 11th–20th | 10 | | 21st–30th | 5 | | 31st+ | 2 | **Strength of Opposition (10)** — average rating of opponents faced in the trial. | Avg Opponent Rating | Points | |---|---:| | 1800+ | 10 | | 1600–1799 | 8 | | 1400–1599 | 6 | | 1200–1399 | 4 | | Below 1200 | 2 | **Number of Wins (10)** — win rate = wins ÷ games played in the trial. | Win Rate | Points | |---|---:| | 80–100% | 10 | | 60–79% | 8 | | 40–59% | 6 | | 20–39% | 4 | | Below 20% | 2 | *A tournament is only counted here after an admin flags it as a District Trial (a checkbox on the tournament upload screen, or the trials list).* ## 2. Official Rating (20) Uses a **weighted average rating**: ``` weighted = 0.60 × Standard + 0.30 × Rapid + 0.10 × Blitz ``` | Weighted Rating | Points | |---|---:| | 1800+ | 20 | | 1600–1799 | 15 | | 1400–1599 | 10 | | 1200–1399 | 5 | | Below 1200 | 2 | ## 3. District Participation (20) `attendance % = events attended ÷ total events hosted this season`. | Attendance % | Points | |---|---:| | 80–100% | 20 | | 60–79% | 15 | | 40–59% | 10 | | Below 40% | 5 | If no events have been hosted yet, this category scores 0. ## 4. Conduct & Discipline (10) Everyone starts at **10**. Each logged incident deducts points; the score is floored at 0. | Incident | Deduction | |---|---:| | Minor Code of Conduct violation | −3 | | Major misconduct at official events | −5 | | Unpaid fines / fraudulent documentation | −10 | ## 5. Proof of Income (10) Taken from the most recent uploaded proof-of-income document's band. | Submission | Points | |---|---:| | SASSA confirmation / unemployed affidavit | 10 | | Low-income band | 7 | | Mid-income band | 4 | | High-income band | 2 | | No submission | −5 (penalty) | --- ## Worked examples ### Example A — Thandi (U14) - Played 2 district trials. - Trial 1: finished 2nd (20), avg opponent 1520 (6), won 4 of 5 = 80% (10) → **36** - Trial 2: finished 7th (15), avg opponent 1610 (8), won 3 of 5 = 60% (8) → **31** - Trial component = (36 + 31) ÷ 2 = **33.5 / 40** - Ratings: Std 1650, Rapid 1500, Blitz 1400 → weighted = 0.60·1650 + 0.30·1500 + 0.10·1400 = 990 + 450 + 140 = **1580** → 1400–1599 band → **10 / 20** - Attended 4 of 5 events = 80% → **20 / 20** - No discipline incidents → **10 / 10** - Uploaded a low-income payslip → **7 / 10** **Total = 33.5 + 10 + 20 + 10 + 7 = 80.5 / 100** ### Example B — Sipho (U16) - One district trial: finished 15th (10), avg opponent 1300 (4), won 2 of 6 = 33% (4) → trial = **18 / 40** - Ratings: Std 1420, Rapid 1380, Blitz 1300 → weighted = 852 + 414 + 130 = **1396** → 1200–1399 band → **5 / 20** - Attended 2 of 5 events = 40% → **10 / 20** - One major misconduct incident → 10 − 5 = **5 / 10** - No income document uploaded → **−5 / 10** **Total = 18 + 5 + 10 + 5 − 5 = 33 / 100** ### Example C — Lerato (U12), no trials yet - No trials played → **0 / 40** - Ratings: Std 1250, Rapid 1200, Blitz 1200 → weighted = 750 + 360 + 120 = **1230** → 1200–1399 → **5 / 20** - Attended 5 of 5 events = 100% → **20 / 20** - No incidents → **10 / 10** - SASSA affidavit uploaded → **10 / 10** **Total = 0 + 5 + 20 + 10 + 10 = 45 / 100** --- *Scores recalculate automatically as trials are flagged, attendance is confirmed, incidents are logged, and income documents are uploaded. Discipline and income are stored as an auditable log/submission (never a hand-edited balance), so the score is always reproducible.*